<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Support new Language C# in addition to Ruby, Javascript and Python in Workato Pros Discussion Board</title>
    <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2421#M1048</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually, I'm a VB.net guy. C# is ok, a little terse, but then that's why I like VB... a little more verbose. If C# could be used, then VB.Net should be able to as well, since they both compile down to MSIL anyway. The more languages the better(within limits, I mean we can skip COBOL, Assembler, Fortran, &amp;amp; LISP among others), more people can use their language of choice... more gets done.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 05:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rcloud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-02T05:42:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support new Language C# in addition to Ruby, Javascript and Python</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2419#M1046</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know that Workato currently has connectors to write Ruby, JavaScript, and Python. We have a large group of users that are very familier and comfortable with C#. Since Microsoft came out with "Blazer" it now is possible for C# to create runnable assemblies on a browser.. wondering if this is on the roadmap to add a C# connector? Anyone else prefer C# to other languages?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2419#M1046</guid>
      <dc:creator>tshoemaker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T13:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support new Language C# in addition to Ruby, Javascript and Python</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2420#M1047</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;C# is a great language. It's easy and comfortable. I like it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:50:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2420#M1047</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvargas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T13:50:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support new Language C# in addition to Ruby, Javascript and Python</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2421#M1048</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually, I'm a VB.net guy. C# is ok, a little terse, but then that's why I like VB... a little more verbose. If C# could be used, then VB.Net should be able to as well, since they both compile down to MSIL anyway. The more languages the better(within limits, I mean we can skip COBOL, Assembler, Fortran, &amp;amp; LISP among others), more people can use their language of choice... more gets done.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 05:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/support-new-language-c-in-addition-to-ruby-javascript-and-python/m-p/2421#M1048</guid>
      <dc:creator>rcloud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-02T05:42:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

