<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Securing Webhook with authentication in Workato Pros Discussion Board</title>
    <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/securing-webhook-with-authentication/m-p/9685#M3948</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've implemented similar setups before and can confirm this will work perfectly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gary1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-18T16:19:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Securing Webhook with authentication</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/securing-webhook-with-authentication/m-p/9684#M3947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently I am doing some research on securing webhook with authentication. My use case is pretty straightforward which is to handle HTTP Post Request from my application to Workato using webhook and if the authentication passed then proceed with the remaining workflow inside Workato recipe else skip calling the webhook. What I have in mind for the implementation is using default Workato trigger condition by comparing token&amp;nbsp; (passed in via Header Authorization) against lookup table as part of authentication process inside my Workto recipe. Is the implementation mentioned above sounds feasible or is there any better idea to achieve that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Quick note: I am aware of the the official&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.workato.com/developing-connectors/sdk/guides/building-triggers/securing-webhooks.html#how-to-guides-securing-webhook-events" target="_self"&gt;article&lt;/A&gt; for the custom connector from Workato site but since our use case is pretty simple hence we are hesitate to go for more complex solution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 06:43:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/securing-webhook-with-authentication/m-p/9684#M3947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-18T06:43:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing Webhook with authentication</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/securing-webhook-with-authentication/m-p/9685#M3948</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've implemented similar setups before and can confirm this will work perfectly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/securing-webhook-with-authentication/m-p/9685#M3948</guid>
      <dc:creator>gary1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-18T16:19:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

