<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to handle failed records separately in Workato Batch Processing? in Workato Pros Discussion Board</title>
    <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/how-to-handle-failed-records-separately-in-workato-batch/m-p/10826#M4269</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://systematic.workato.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/12025"&gt;@dawidleman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Workato, whether you can separate failed records from successful ones in a batch really depends on the connector:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If the connector returns per-record results in the batch response&lt;/STRONG&gt; (for example, some database/Salesforce bulk actions or APIs that return an array of statuses), then you can directly filter the output list into successes and failures and handle them separately.&lt;BR /&gt;Reference:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.workato.com/en/connectors/salesforce/batch-operations.html#create-records-in-batches" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Salesforce batch operations | Workato Docs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If the connector only returns aggregate success/failure&lt;/STRONG&gt; ( where the whole batch may fail without giving individual record details), then Workato won’t let you directly differentiate between failed and successful records. In this case, you need a workaround, such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running smaller batch sizes to isolate bad records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Falling back to record-by-record processing when the batch fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, the short answer is: &lt;STRONG&gt;Yes, it’s possible if the connector supports record-level batch results. If not, you’ll need to design a workaround since Workato can’t inherently split failed vs successful records in those cases.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;I hope this gives you a clarity on processing batch records.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Shivakumar K A&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 16:18:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shivakumara</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-02T16:18:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to handle failed records separately in Workato Batch Processing?</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/how-to-handle-failed-records-separately-in-workato-batch/m-p/10825#M4261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to separate failed record from a batch action and perform logic on it? What I want to achieve is to process all successful records in the batch and separate the failed ones. Wondering if it's possible with Workato Batch Processing, or do I need to go through each record one by one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/how-to-handle-failed-records-separately-in-workato-batch/m-p/10825#M4261</guid>
      <dc:creator>dawidleman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-02T14:26:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle failed records separately in Workato Batch Processing?</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/how-to-handle-failed-records-separately-in-workato-batch/m-p/10826#M4269</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://systematic.workato.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/12025"&gt;@dawidleman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Workato, whether you can separate failed records from successful ones in a batch really depends on the connector:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If the connector returns per-record results in the batch response&lt;/STRONG&gt; (for example, some database/Salesforce bulk actions or APIs that return an array of statuses), then you can directly filter the output list into successes and failures and handle them separately.&lt;BR /&gt;Reference:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.workato.com/en/connectors/salesforce/batch-operations.html#create-records-in-batches" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Salesforce batch operations | Workato Docs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If the connector only returns aggregate success/failure&lt;/STRONG&gt; ( where the whole batch may fail without giving individual record details), then Workato won’t let you directly differentiate between failed and successful records. In this case, you need a workaround, such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running smaller batch sizes to isolate bad records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Falling back to record-by-record processing when the batch fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, the short answer is: &lt;STRONG&gt;Yes, it’s possible if the connector supports record-level batch results. If not, you’ll need to design a workaround since Workato can’t inherently split failed vs successful records in those cases.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;I hope this gives you a clarity on processing batch records.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Shivakumar K A&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 16:18:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/how-to-handle-failed-records-separately-in-workato-batch/m-p/10826#M4269</guid>
      <dc:creator>shivakumara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-02T16:18:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

