<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Defining variables that are based on other variables in the same action in Workato Pros Discussion Board</title>
    <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2215#M932</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;ok understand. Based on my test , VariableONE will still be nil or null till that step completes but maybe there are other ways.. BTW , if you have a really large recipe with lot of steps, try breaking it into multiple callable functions - modular.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rituraj</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-27T08:39:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Defining variables that are based on other variables in the same action</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2212#M929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When defining new variables, sometimes it is necessary to define VariableONE, and then define VariableTWO as something that was dependant on the results of VariableONE. For Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VariableONE = "ABC"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VariableTWO = VariableOne + "DEF"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that you can do this in two separate tasks, but I was wondering if this could be done within one task since you can create multiple variables within on task.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 03:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2212#M929</guid>
      <dc:creator>tshoemaker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-27T03:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining variables that are based on other variables in the same action</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2213#M930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;can be done but the result is not what you want. Since variableONE is being initialized and default value supplied in the same step , variableONE does not get the value till the step completes. Not sure what could be the use case for this - in the same step? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:29:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2213#M930</guid>
      <dc:creator>rituraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-27T08:29:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining variables that are based on other variables in the same action</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2214#M931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The use case... if i am extracting a piece of data into a variable that will be reused, and then I want to use that same varialbe to build another variable as well. IF i have to do this in two tasks, it proliferates tasks. I want to reduce the task load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:31:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2214#M931</guid>
      <dc:creator>tshoemaker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-27T08:31:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining variables that are based on other variables in the same action</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2215#M932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ok understand. Based on my test , VariableONE will still be nil or null till that step completes but maybe there are other ways.. BTW , if you have a really large recipe with lot of steps, try breaking it into multiple callable functions - modular.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/2215#M932</guid>
      <dc:creator>rituraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-27T08:39:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Defining variables that are based on other variables in the same action</title>
      <link>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/3847#M1776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://systematic.workato.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2706"&gt;@tshoemaker&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; if this isn't already an Idea, you should submit it b/c I've wished for the same, and lamented the fact that I had to spend extra tasks for it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://ideas.workato.com/app/#/user/suggest?currentProductId=caf1efdf-1d7e-4b7b-aeb9-28e4b0f4b25c" target="_blank"&gt;https://ideas.workato.com/app/#/user/suggest?currentProductId=caf1efdf-1d7e-4b7b-aeb9-28e4b0f4b25c&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:19:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://systematic.workato.com/t5/workato-pros-discussion-board/defining-variables-that-are-based-on-other-variables-in-the-same/m-p/3847#M1776</guid>
      <dc:creator>mppowe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T14:19:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

